The Supreme Court

The Supreme Court: should we abolish it? - Vox
    The Supreme Court is the highest judicial court in a country or stat and it consists of nine justices. The Supreme Court starts off with a case and thousands of petitions. All nine justices are crucial in each and everyone of these cases.

    Each justice serves about 16 years and there have been over 100 of them. In 1789, when the Supreme Court first started, it was hard for Americans to grasp the idea of it and its dominance. However, after 200 years Americans have finally accepted the courts power and authority.

    Each year, there are about 7,000 cases. Each justice gets a load of cases that they must decide on their own time, as well as a whole. The justices have stated that oral argument makes a huge difference when coming down to a decision. Abstract principles must be applied to real life situations. A couple days after a case, the 9 justices sit in their conference room to discuss and come down to a final decision. By the end of their term in June, they must state their final decision. During that time up to June, if they have opposing arguments on a case they have to do their absolute best job to convince one another of their ideas. It takes multiple drafts, sometimes at least 12, to convince each other. A minority can very quickly become a majority.

    The justices spend so much time, and put so much effort into each case, that people are finally willing to accept the fact that the court is a reliable source.


    The power of the Supreme Court is trust earned by the American people. To get the most recent news on the Supreme Court, check out the link below!

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/27/opinion/trump-biden-2020-supreme-court.html

















Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

State V. Mann

Image
 The State V. Mann's case was about an individual named John Mann, who had hired Lydia, who was a slave of Elizabeth Jones. After he had chastised her, she ran off. Mann ended up shooting Lydia and wounded her, however, she was still alive after the attack.  The state of North Carolina ended up charging Mann with assault.  The trial judge charged the Jury, that if they believed the punishment inflicted by Mann was cruel and uncalled for, that in the law the Defendant was guilty, as he only had a special property in the slave. The jury convicted the Defendant, and Mann appealed the conviction.   My group and I looked at all aspects of this case. This included religion, ethics, emotions, history, law, and economics.  My viewpoints however were solely based on the religious aspect of this case.  Religion does not support slavery by any means. In fact, It has been opposed on religious grounds. Throughout most religions slavery was accepted as an institutio...
Read more

EOTO

Image
In the Reconstruction Era, the Freedmen's Bureau was beneficial for the time being.  It was a lso known as the Bureau of Refugees. It was a U.S. government agency from 1865 to 1872. The Bureau was placed under the authority of the War Department and the majority of its original employees were soldiers from the Civil War.  It was established on March 3rd, 1865 by Congress to help millions of former black slaves and poor whites in the South as a result of the Civil War.  With the Freedmen's Bureau came food, housing, medical aid, established schools, and offered legal assistance. The Freedmen's Bureau was organized into districts covering the 11 former rebel states, the border states of Kentucky, Maryland, and West Virginia, and Washington, D.C. Each district was headed by an assistant commissioner.  While the Bureau was active, it was underfunded and understaffed. With only 900 agents at its peak, some were corrupt or incompetent and others were brave and hardworking ...
Read more

Plessy V. Ferguson

Image
 In the Plessy V. Ferguson case,  Louisiana has a law adopted in 1892 requiring all private railroad companies to have separate accommodations for black and white passengers. Homer Plessy, who is 1/8ths black, got a first-class ticket. Apparently doing this broke the law. He ended up suing under the 14th amendment. There were two sides to this case. It was the state (Ferguson) against Homer Plessy. According to Homer Plessy's side, it e stablished the constitutionality of racial segregation. Plessy should not have been required to give up his right or access his train car. The Constitution should be colorblind so they don’t have to view color as a reason for treating other people differently.  Plessy had every right to not move because his rights were violated. The equal protection clause was violated and P lessy did nothing wrong. On the state's side (Ferguson), s ince slavery ended the state has tried to include blacks into society without violence, fear, or hate....
Read more